This graph shows that ethnicities form voting blocs. And this is only an example, there are countless graphs showing the same trend all over the world as well as in the US.
This shows that there is a case that multiculturalism is incompatible with democracy if we consider the idea that democracy is supposed to get the fairest outcome.
Because how can democracy be a fair system if democracy is heavily based on race to the point where the outcome of democratic elections is heavily swayed by the size of racial groups?
Isn’t that a form of racism?
It’s not just me that can see the problems here. Here is an interpretation related to this. Guillaume Faye on Aristotle,
“For Aristotle, democracy is possible only within homogeneous ethnic groups, while despots have always reigned over highly fragmented societies. A multi-ethnic society is thus necessarily anti-democratic and chaotic, for it lacks philia, this profound, flesh-and-blood fraternity of citizens. Tyrants and despots divide and rule, they want the City divided by ethnic rivalries. The indispensable condition for ensuring people’s sovereignty accordingly resides in its unity. Ethnic chaos prevents all philia from developing.”
I believe that there is a case for mass migration being anti-democratic because of this ethnic voting block issue.
If we know that ethnic voting blocs exist, then we also know that importing people that will form these skewed voting blocs goes against commonly understood democratic principles like that of fairness.
This seems very easy to understand, so are they simply doing this to manipulate voting statistics for their own tyrannical benefit?
Is it fair to import people knowing full well that the statistics show time and time again that they will vote a certain way?
Especially when you know they’ll either vote for your party or your satellite party…
In the example graph we can see clearly that ethnic minorities support the socialist left. Whereas the white British support the conservative right for the most part.
Therefore the native British who the democracy was built for in the first place are having their choice stifled by imported multicultural votes.
So which one does the government want?
Democracy or multiculturalism?
Here’s a quote about tyranny from Aristotle,
“It is also a habit of tyrants to prefer the company of aliens to that of citizens at table and in society; citizens, they feel, are enemies, but aliens will offer no opposition.”
Sounds a lot like Keir Starmer. Or Anthony Albanese. Or Mark Carney. Or Democrats in the US.
Aristotle clearly saw, and you and I can clearly see, that manipulating voting outcomes is not democratic, yet without that manipulation our current socialist governments would be voted out.
So are we all going to live in cognitive dissonance over this? Or are we going to point out that you can’t have multiculturalism at the same time as you have a fair democracy.
Because imported foreign voting blocs is not fair at all.
Last quote…. I’m sure you can guess who wrote this,
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
A quote that’s much more relevant by the day…
Alex James.